Verified representation

Person · Other

Ingrid M. Córdova

Project design and management coordinator

Bilbao

Financial Specialist / Finance Manager / Controller/ Discovering new style of relationships with social and business impact - Financial professional with more than 10 years experience in financial management, auditing and internal control in international environments, including projects funded by the World Bank. - Specialized in financial planning, budgetary control and regulatory compliance. - Experience in managing financial processes and optimizing resources in the public, private and international cooperation sectors.

Explore improvements Visit Web

6 recorded improvements

Impact

points accumulated

Reliability

Support for the information

Formulas and versions

Detail of score

The data are calculated with improvements, evidence and connections currently published in EkoPulse.

Model used for this calculation: Impact 2.0 · Reliability 1.3.

Impact: 16 points

Cumulative score

Provisional model: each improvement is assessed by its reach for this profile type, from symbolic to transformative. The same work counts once. Contributions are combined with diminishing returns, and relevant relationships are added. Evidence adds 0 direct Impact points. This does not measure tonnes or net impact.

The highest reach levels require human confirmation; until then they receive a conservative rating. New or edited improvements use a provisional level until their current text is reviewed.

6 sustainable improvements (weighed by their reach)+14.6

1 improvements describing the same work (counted once)·

0 improvements with evidence+0

11 ecosystem connections+0.1245

Profile’s own base15

Ecosystem influence+1

Total impact16

The own base combines practices and direct relationships. Direct relationships and ecosystem influence together add at most 4 points. Ecosystem influence can extend up to 3 steps away and depends on relationship trust and nearby profiles’ data. A disputed relationship transmits no influence through the graph, although it can retain direct credit if its category is eligible. Relationships do not generate negative points. Now add up. 0,5 points, rounded to 1 on the score.

The advisory thresholds are 25 profiles with improvements, 5 with at least 25 points and at least one reaching 95 points. The current figures are 2, 1 and 46, respectively. Reaching these thresholds does not activate comparison: it requires a model decision.

Reliability: D

5 / 100

The model first places the information in a band according to its supporting evidence. It then calculates the score within that band.

Insufficient documentary support

Applicable band0–49

Coverage: 0 of 6 improvements with evidence

Band baseline0

Practice coverage+0

Source diversity+0

Documentary support+0

Source independence+0

Corroboration+0

Profile information+3.92

Direct relationships+1.05

Ecosystem support+0

Total reliability5 / 100

Contributions are shown rounded; the total uses the original calculation before final rounding. Ecosystem support is already included and is not added again. Under the current model, the maximum attainable is B+ (84/100).

See the full calculation →

Evolution of the score

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

Updated model · Discontinuity indicates a change in methodology.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

Catch (UTC)	Impact	Reliability	Model
26/8/2026, 03:52:19	29	24 (D)	1.2
28/8/2026, 22:36:49	29	24 (D)	1.2.1
29/8/2026, 15:55:49	29	5 (D)	1.3
8/9/2026, 14:49:22	24,12	5 (D)	1.4
11/9/2026, 03:53:46	24,12	5 (D)	1.4
23/9/2026, 03:00:27	24,12	5 (D)	1.4

Impact Reference

There's not enough yet people with a public score to offer a useful reference. It takes at least 3; now there is 2.

Sustainable improvements

6 recorded improvements · A selection to get started

Browse by topic

Energy

Use of low-consumption LED bulbs Official information

Water

Use of dishwasher Official informationSaving water and energy by use of apartition that reduces such consumption.

Mobility

Use of public transport Official informationMain means of transport, primarily for mobility to work.

Community and persons

Metrics

Impact and reliability over time

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

Updated model · Discontinuity indicates a change in methodology.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

The milestones distinguish the beginning of an action and its registration in EkoPulse. They do not automatically attribute a punctuation change to that action.

Catch (UTC)	Impact	Reliability	Model
26/8/2026, 03:52:19	29	24 (D)	1.2
28/8/2026, 22:36:49	29	24 (D)	1.2.1
29/8/2026, 15:55:49	29	5 (D)	1.3
8/9/2026, 14:49:22	24,12	5 (D)	1.4
11/9/2026, 03:53:46	24,12	5 (D)	1.4
23/9/2026, 03:00:27	24,12	5 (D)	1.4