Unclaimed profileTo claim it, first create an account or log in. Only the person, organization or organisation holding the profile, or someone authorized to represent it, may apply. EkoPulse will review the application.
CEA — Centro de Estudios Ambientales
Organization · Other

CEA — Centro de Estudios Ambientales

Organisation of the Municipality of Vitoria-Gasteiz

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Álava, Euskadi

The Centre for Environmental Studies (CEA) is the body of studies and environmental education of Vitoria-Gasteiz City Council.

20 recorded improvements

Impact
68
points accumulated
Reliability
D
Support for the information
Formulas and versions

Detail of score

The data are calculated with improvements, evidence and connections currently published in EkoPulse.

Model used for this calculation: Impact 2.0 · Reliability 1.3.

Impact: 68 points

Cumulative score

Provisional model: each improvement is assessed by its reach for this profile type, from symbolic to transformative. The same work counts once. Contributions are combined with diminishing returns, and relevant relationships are added. Evidence adds 0 direct Impact points. This does not measure tonnes or net impact.

The highest reach levels require human confirmation; until then they receive a conservative rating. New or edited improvements use a provisional level until their current text is reviewed.

20 sustainable improvements (weighed by their reach)+67.3
1 improvements describing the same work (counted once)·
0 improvements with evidence+0
5 ecosystem connections+0.2588
Profile’s own base68
Ecosystem influence+0
Total impact68

The own base combines practices and direct relationships. Direct relationships and ecosystem influence together add at most 4 points. Ecosystem influence can extend up to 3 steps away and depends on relationship trust and nearby profiles’ data. A disputed relationship transmits no influence through the graph, although it can retain direct credit if its category is eligible. Relationships do not generate negative points.

The advisory thresholds are 25 profiles with improvements, 5 with at least 25 points and at least one reaching 95 points. The current figures are 112, 34 and 72, respectively. Reaching these thresholds does not activate comparison: it requires a model decision.

Reliability: D

4 / 100

The model first places the information in a band according to its supporting evidence. It then calculates the score within that band.

Insufficient documentary support

Applicable band0–49
Coverage: 0 of 20 improvements with evidence
Band baseline0
Practice coverage+0
Source diversity+0
Documentary support+0
Source independence+0
Corroboration+0
Profile information+3.92
Direct relationships+0
Ecosystem support+0
Total reliability4 / 100

Contributions are shown rounded; the total uses the original calculation before final rounding. Ecosystem support is already included and is not added again. Under the current model, the maximum attainable is B+ (84/100).

See the full calculation →

Evolution of the score

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

0204060Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 8/9/2026, 14:49:22 UTC: 40,26Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 11/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 40,260255075100Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 8/9/2026, 14:49:22 UTC: 4Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 11/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 48 Sep 269 Sep 2611 Sep 26

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

Catch (UTC)ImpactReliabilityModel
8/9/2026, 14:49:2240,264 (D)1.4
11/9/2026, 03:53:4640,264 (D)1.4

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

Impact Reference

  • This profile67.55879999999999
  • Mean profile Impact19
  • Top 20%46

Sample: 112 organizations with a public score.

Sustainable improvements

20 recorded improvements · A selection to get started

Energy

Energy
Support from CEA to municipal services under mobility plan Added by EkoPulseThe CEA supports municipal technical services in the development of the Vitoria-Gasteiz Mobility Plan through various studies and pilot initiatives.

Mobility

Mobility
Gautxori Morea: TUVISA night bus management on demand Added by EkoPulseThe CEA has developed, together with TUVISA and a startup and with funding from EIT Urban Mobility, the Gautxori Morea project: a pilot to manage by means of an app the ups and downs on demand in the night services of TUVISA, expanding the number of stops and strengthening the security of the offer of night bus for women and under 18 years old.

Waste

Waste
Criteria for the circularity of materials in the energy rehabilitation of 358 houses in Zaramaga Added by EkoPulseIn collaboration with Ensanche 21 and the cluster of construction of Euskadi Build:Inn, the CEA has defined and integrated criteria for the circularity of materials in technical projects for the energy rehabilitation of 358 housing units in the neighborhood of Zaramaga (Vitoria-Gasteiz), and continues to collaborate in the award and execution phase of the works (2024), with the aim of producing a document of barriers and learning replicable in future rehabilitations.

Ecosystem

Community and persons

Food

Metrics

Impact and reliability over time

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

0204060Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 8/9/2026, 14:49:22 UTC: 40,26Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 11/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 40,260255075100Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 8/9/2026, 14:49:22 UTC: 4Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 11/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 48 Sep 269 Sep 2611 Sep 26

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

The milestones distinguish the beginning of an action and its registration in EkoPulse. They do not automatically attribute a punctuation change to that action.

Catch (UTC)ImpactReliabilityModel
8/9/2026, 14:49:2240,264 (D)1.4
11/9/2026, 03:53:4640,264 (D)1.4

Consumption and other measurements

No public measurements are available for this profile yet.

Frameworks and recognitions

Contributions to the SDGs

Declared links

24 links to improvements

Connected ecosystem

Do you know information about this profile?

Any registered person can provide information. There is no need to represent this organization or be verified.

Contribute information

Transparency and provenancei

Official information0
Community0
References in this section0

This count covers references added in this section; it excludes documents and evidence in other sections of the profile.

There are no posts or references in this section yet.