Unclaimed profileTo claim it, first create an account or log in. Only the person, organization or organisation holding the profile, or someone authorized to represent it, may apply. EkoPulse will review the application.
Ayuntamiento de Eibar
Organization · Public administration

Ayuntamiento de Eibar

Gipuzkoa

El Ayuntamiento de Eibar es una administración pública ubicada en Gipuzkoa.

3 recorded improvements

Impact
19
points accumulated
Reliability
D
Support for the information
Formulas and versions

Detail of score

The data are calculated with improvements, evidence and connections currently published in EkoPulse.

Model used for this calculation: Impact 2.0 · Reliability 1.3.

Impact: 19 points

Cumulative score

Provisional model: each improvement is assessed by its reach for this profile type, from symbolic to transformative. The same work counts once. Contributions are combined with diminishing returns, and relevant relationships are added. Evidence adds 0 direct Impact points. This does not measure tonnes or net impact.

The highest reach levels require human confirmation; until then they receive a conservative rating. New or edited improvements use a provisional level until their current text is reviewed. At municipal scale, overlap between improvements acting on the same area is also limited.

3 sustainable improvements (weighed by their reach)+18.6
0 improvements with evidence+0
0 ecosystem connections+0
Profile’s own base19
Ecosystem influence+0
Total impact19

The own base combines practices and direct relationships. Direct relationships and ecosystem influence together add at most 4 points. Ecosystem influence can extend up to 3 steps away and depends on relationship trust and nearby profiles’ data. A disputed relationship transmits no influence through the graph, although it can retain direct credit if its category is eligible. Relationships do not generate negative points.

The advisory thresholds are 25 profiles with improvements, 5 with at least 25 points and at least one reaching 95 points. The current figures are 112, 34 and 72, respectively. Reaching these thresholds does not activate comparison: it requires a model decision.

Reliability: D

4 / 100

The model first places the information in a band according to its supporting evidence. It then calculates the score within that band.

Insufficient documentary support

Applicable band0–49
Coverage: 0 of 3 improvements with evidence
Band baseline0
Practice coverage+0
Source diversity+0
Documentary support+0
Source independence+0
Corroboration+0
Profile information+3.92
Direct relationships+0
Ecosystem support+0
Total reliability4 / 100

Contributions are shown rounded; the total uses the original calculation before final rounding. Ecosystem support is already included and is not added again. Under the current model, the maximum attainable is B+ (84/100).

See the full calculation →

Evolution of the score

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

051015Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 13/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 15Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 26/9/2026, 3:00:27 UTC: 150255075100Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 13/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 3Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 26/9/2026, 3:00:27 UTC: 413 Sep 2619 Sep 2626 Sep 26

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

Catch (UTC)ImpactReliabilityModel
13/9/2026, 03:53:46153 (D)1.4
26/9/2026, 03:00:27154 (D)1.4

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

Impact Reference

  • This profile18.6
  • Mean profile Impact19
  • Top 20%46

Sample: 112 organizations with a public score.

Sustainable improvements

3 recorded improvements

Energy

Energy
Installation of 120 photovoltaic plates on the roof of the Colosseum Theatre Added by EkoPulseThe City of Eibar installed 120 Photovoltaic plates on the roof of the Colosseum Theatre, with a 50 kilowatts and a municipal investment of 52.551 EUR (IVA including), achieving the complete energy self-sufficiency of this municipal facility, within the commitments of the Action Plan for Climate and Sustainable Energy (PACES) of Eibar 2022-2030.
Energy
Photovoltaic self-consumption facilities in three public schools (Sansaburu, San Andrés, Azitain) Added by EkoPulseThe Eibar City Council launched the installation of photovoltaic systems for instant self-consumption in three public educational centres -- Sansaburu Eskola, San Andrés Eskola and Azitaingo Herri Institutua -- with an aid of 35,000 euros from Gipuzkoa Historical Territory granted in 2025. The system will cover approximately 50% of energy consumption in the Sansaburu school and 25% in San Andrés and Azitain, within Eibar's Action Plan for Climate and Sustainable Energy (PACES) 2022-2030 (approved on 30-01-2023, target to reduce 55% greenhouse gas emissions).
Energy
TEK Eibar: local energy community on three municipal roofs Added by EkoPulseThe City of Eibar, together with the Gipuzkoa Provincial Council and Next Generation funds, launched TEK Eibar (Tokiko Energia Komunitatea), granting free three municipal roofs (Casa de Cultura Portalea, Colegio Virgen de Arrate and Colegio Amaña) to install 364 solar panels (1,093 m2, 163 kW), with a budget of 197,000 euros (100,000 euros from the Diputación de Gipuzkoa), intended to benefit about 246 homes and small businesses within a radius of two kilometers by 100% renewable energy sharing.
Metrics

Impact and reliability over time

The history shows saved snapshots, not a live calculation. Each snapshot retains the model used to calculate it; a model change does not by itself mean the profile’s activity changed.

051015Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 13/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 15Impact · points · eje izquierdo · 26/9/2026, 3:00:27 UTC: 150255075100Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 13/9/2026, 3:53:46 UTC: 3Reliability · sobre 100 · eje derecho · 26/9/2026, 3:00:27 UTC: 413 Sep 2619 Sep 2626 Sep 26

Two different scales; the heights of the curves cannot be compared.

View snapshots and methodology

Two different scales, the same dates. Only recorded snapshots are shown; earlier scores are not reconstructed.

EkoPulse scores are recalculated as the available information changes and the evaluation model evolves. Methodological improvements may result in changes in the score that do not necessarily reflect an equivalent change in profile performance.

The milestones distinguish the beginning of an action and its registration in EkoPulse. They do not automatically attribute a punctuation change to that action.

Catch (UTC)ImpactReliabilityModel
13/9/2026, 03:53:46153 (D)1.4
26/9/2026, 03:00:27154 (D)1.4

Consumption and other measurements

No public measurements are available for this profile yet.

Frameworks and recognitions

Contributions to the SDGs

Declared links

6 links to improvements

Do you know information about this profile?

Any registered person can provide information. There is no need to represent this organization or be verified.

Contribute information

Transparency and provenancei

Official information0
Community0
References in this section0

This count covers references added in this section; it excludes documents and evidence in other sections of the profile.

There are no posts or references in this section yet.